Very recently, I was given
the opportunity to join a group that provided me with the opportunity to
present at my county’s administrative building. I was presenting on behalf of
PBIS, or Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports. Usually, only teachers
and administrators present at that event, but my school’s assistant principal
decided that it would be very unique and powerful if students presented
instead.
The presentation itself
was about what programs my school had put into place to prevent troublesome
behaviors that we had pinpointed from data. The program that I was presenting
for was the Student Advisory Planning Team. I was invited into it, even though
it’s not an exclusive program, to plan advisory lessons for students, by
students. Advisory is a thirty-minute period in between our first and second
blocks. On Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday, students go to their teachers
to conference grades, study, and anything else to help them in that class. On
Wednesday, however, students go to advisory, a class that acts as homeroom,
where forms can be handed out, SATs can be taken, and valuable lessons can be
taught.
Having lessons in
advisory provides an opportunity for students to plan lessons in the form of
the Student Advisory Planning Team. As a team, we meet up once at the beginning
of each semester to discuss what we deem important subjects to address in the
form of lessons. The ideas are written up on a board and the students call dibs
on which lessons they want to plan. From there, the groups would plan the
lessons in their free time and turn the lesson plans in and get them checked by
an administrator.
Having students plan the
advisory lessons benefits the school in a surprising amount of ways. The
biggest pro about it is that it strengthens the school community vibe. When
students are placed in a position of power, like planning school-wide lessons,
they are more eager to be involved in the school community. It also makes
advisory more enjoyable for students that aren’t participating in the Planning
Team, despite the fact that the team isn’t selective. Because students planned
the lesson for other students, the lesson tends to be more enjoyable to learn
for them.
The main reasons of
establishing programs like this are to cut down on bad behavior and strengthen
school interest, but there are so many ways to do it. The most important aspect
to have, however, is that the students are working with the teachers to
accomplish real, tangible results, not worksheets. But, with requirements as
few as that, there are unlimited ways to carry this out.
Susan Ohanian, for
example, set up an extracurricular activity in which students gave up their
lunch blocks to write rather than doing the misbehaviors I mentioned. The lure
of a positive activity that a teacher set up prevented kids from loitering
around the bathrooms and doing other misbehaviors. “The lure of writer’s
workshop… the promise of peace and quiet.” (Caught in the Middle, 2001). Once
the students were intrigued, Susan worked with the students to better their
writing and eventually publish a real anthology. Susan Ohanian executed that
very well. She worked with students to create real results and through doing
it, prevented undesirable behavior.
Another
possibility could be something like an administration discussion. Students
could go there and state their opinions. They would work with one another and
the administration, perhaps making new school rules or organizations. They
would obviously be connected to the teachers through talking with them. They
would also churn out lots of improvements, making the school a better place.
It’s very important to
have organizations like these in place, not only to prevent bad behavior, but
also to teach students important skills, primarily teamwork. Students working
with administration also yields lots of results like school being better or
books being published. Having organizations like these in place also increase
the students’ eagerness for school and the other aspects of their lives, which
boosts morale.
I hope that
administrators or teachers reading this can utilize the traits that all of the
aforementioned organizations share to create their own unique organizations
that benefit their school and students in many ways.
Ohanian, Susan. Caught in the Middle: Nonstandard Kids and a
Killing Curriculum. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2001. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment